Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

552 So. 2d 191

Hovater v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 29, 1989

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 1989-09-29

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2007

2 state decisions

Relies on Ex Parte Benson · Benson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-09-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1

¶2The appellant was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol. The appellant pleaded guilty in district court and was sentenced to six months' imprisonment. This sentence was suspended, contingent on the appellant's completion of DUI school and the appellant's refraining from driving under the influence. The appellant was further ordered to spend 48 hours in jail within the pending 30 day period and was fined $500 and court costs. The appellant thereafter gave notice of appeal.

¶3He was charged in circuit court with driving under the influence of alcohol, in violation of § 32-5A-191(a)(2), Codeof Alabama (1975). As noted by the State on appeal, there is no indication in the record that the appellant was ever arraigned in circuit court or that he waived arraignment. Further, the appellant's counsel clearly brought that fact to the trial court's attention. Nevertheless, he was tried, found guilty, and sentenced to 48 hours in jail and fined $750 and court costs.

¶4The State has declined to submit argument and requests that this cause be reversed and remanded for a new trial on the authority of Benson v. State, 473 So.2d 1131 (Ala.Cr.App.), affirmed, 473 So.2d 1132 (Ala. 1985), and the cases cited therein. Because there is no indication that the appellant was ever arraigned or that he waived arraignment, this cause is reversed and remanded for a new trial.

¶5REVERSED AND REMANDED.

¶6All Judges concur.

/552/so2d/191 · .json · Public domain