State v. Mallett’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably State Ex Rel. Porter v. Butler (1991), 670 So. 2d 713 - State v. Pyke (1996)
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Solem v. Helm · Rideout v. United States · Rummel v. Estelle · State v. Sepulvado · 425 So. 2d 1251 - State v. Telsee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. Theft of a motor vehicle is the intentional performance of any bf the following acts: (1) The taking of a motor vehicle, which belongs to another, either without the owner’s consent or by means- of fraudulent conduct, practices, or representations, with the intention to permanently deprive the owner- of the motor vehicle; or (2) The taking control of a motor vehicle that is lost or mis-delivered under circumstances which provide a means of inquiry as to the true owner, and the person in control of the motor vehicle does not make reasonable efforts to notify or locate the true owner; or (3) The taking control of a motor vehicle when the person knows or should have known that the motor vehicle has been stolen. [[Image here]] C. (1) Whoever commits the crime of theft of a motor vehicle when the misappropriation or taking amounts to a sum of one thousand five hundred dollars or more shall be imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not more than ten years, or may be fined not more than three thousand dollars, or both. (2) Whoever commits the crime of theft of a motor vehicle when the misappropriation or taking amounts to a sum of five hundred dollars or more but less than one thousand five hundred dollars shall be imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not more than five years, or may be fined not more than two thousand dollars, or both. (3) Whoever commits the- crime of theft of a motor vehicle when the misappropriation or taking amounts to a sum of less than five hun”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The only sequential requirement in the statute, as it now reads, is that in order to be available for a defendant’s adjudication as a multiple offender, a prior conviction must precede the commission of the principal offense.” Mallett , at 31.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Talley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.