552 So. 2d 337 - Goene v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1991
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. DiFrancesco · 511 So. 2d 295 - Florida Bar v. Johnson · United States v. Bishop · State v. Burton · 335 So. 2d 608 - Katz v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Are the holdings in Senior v. State, 502 So.2d 1360 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 511 So.2d 299 (Fla. 1987); Katz v. State, 335 So.2d 608 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); and Doe v. State, 492 So.2d 842 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), valid, in light of the enactment of the sentencing guidelines, for the reason that a complete and accurate prior criminal record of a defendant is essential to a proper computation of a sentence under said guidelines?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Goene v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.