552 So. 2d 781 - State v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 1996
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Edwards · State in Interest of TLR · State v. Latil · State v. Daniels · Snider v. Snider
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Therefore, we maintain our previous conclusion that Judge Downing’s ruling quashing the first indictment did not prevent the State from reinstituting criminal proceedings against the defendant. We also maintain our previous decision that the defendant suffered no permanent prejudice by the State’s breaeh of its agreement ... noting that this Court’s order quashing the second indictment and requiring the State to resubmit the matter ... placed the parties in the same position that they occupied before the agreement to resubmit was breached.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.