552 So. 2d 928 - Johnson v. Bednar’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 471 So. 2d 1274 - Bowen v. Bowen · Florida Bar Re Amendment to Article XI, Florida Bar Integration Rule (Rules of Discipline) · 433 So. 2d 1033 - Florida Coast Bank of Pompano Beach v. Mayes · Balzam v. Cohen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Such a contention would be sustainable if incarceration had been ordered, but a purge provision is not required if the contemnor does not need a key to his prison cell. In the case at bar, the trial court did not impose imprisonment. See Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 1985). A purging provision, therefore, was unnecessary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. Bednar“knowingly and in willful disregard of the Final Judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. Bednar
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.