Moreland v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2009
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kehoe v. State · 505 So. 2d 621 - Lobo v. Metro-Dade Police Dept. · 381 So. 2d 1180 - State v. Goodley · Brown v. State · 388 So. 2d 286 - Robinson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We do not agree with the defendant’s argument that the stop was an invalid pretextual stop. While there was evidence indicating invalid subjective pre-textual motives of the officers, there was also evidence of valid objective bases for the stop.... Each officer testified that he would have stopped any driver under the circumstances.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(emphasis added). The court held that consent to the search of the inside of the car did not authorize the search of the trunk. See also Rodriguez v. State, 539 So.2d 513 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) (holding that officer's request to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“which the officers searched without any further consent and to which the officers gained access with a key removed from the car's ignition without defendant's consent ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.