Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 552 SW2D 757 - Trail v. State

Trail v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
3
states following
September 2006
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · California v. Byers · McBee v. State · Jamison v. State · Braziel v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]n officer may, in the course of an investigation of an automobile accident, make inquiry of a person to determine if he had been operating a vehicle involved in a collision without giving the Miranda advice. Further, it is our opinion that the statement of a person in response to such a question, revealing that he was in fact the operator of a vehicle involved in an accident, is admissible and not a violation of the Fifth (5th) Amendment of the United States Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.