Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 552 SW3D 183 - State v. Estep

State v. Estep’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Campbell · State v. Reynolds · State v. Supinski · State v. Winder · State of Missouri v. Wesley William Osborn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “having actual or constructive possession of an object with knowledge of its presence. A person has actual possession if such person has the object on his or her person or within easy reach and convenient control. A person has constructive possession if such person has the power and the intention at a given time to exercise dominion or control over the object either directly or through another person or persons. Possession may also be sole or joint. If one person alone has possession of an object, possession is sole. If two or more persons share possession of an object, possession is joint[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.