Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 552 SW3D 226 - Ex parte Pue

Ex parte Pue’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ewing v. California · 13 Cal. 4th 497 - People v. Superior Court (Romero) · 41 Cal. 3d 144 - People v. Balderas · Marin v. State · Hughes v. Fetter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial or appellate court which otherwise has jurisdiction over a criminal conviction may always notice and correct an illegal sentence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “if it is shown on the trial of a felony offense other than a state jail felony ... that the defendant has previously been finally convicted of two felony offenses, and the second previous felony conviction is for an offense that occurred subsequent to the first previous conviction having become final[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “principle that an 'illegal sentence' may be raised 'at any time,' regardless of whether there was a contemporaneous objection lodged at trial, does not apply with respect to improper enhancement claims-or at least not all (and maybe not even most ) improper-enhancement claims.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.