Singh v. Mukasey’s Empirical Analysis
553 F.3d 207 · 2009
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Reno v. Flores · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza · Secaida-Rosales v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Bridges v. Wixon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“susceptible to corruption during the course of an improper interview.” Id. at 214-16 . 10 . The Ninth Circuit’s view that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cotzojay v. Holder“It is well established that the Fifth Amendment affords aliens due process of law during deportation proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.