United States v. McCall’s Empirical Analysis
553 F.3d 821 · 2008
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably United States v. Ebron (2012), United States v. Olguin (2011)
14 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 860 (§ 419 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Beechum · United States v. Garcia · United States v. Hatter · United States v. Reyna · United States v. Floresca
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“will affirm if a reasonable trier of fact could conclude the elements of the offense were established beyond a reasonable doubt, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and drawing all reasonable inferences from the evidence to support the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“offered only: (1) an aerial photograph without scale * * *; and (2) testimony from [a detective] that he had driven the streets shown in the photograph a number of times and that the school and house were, in his opinion, within 1000 feet of each other.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Montgomery“First, it must be determined that the extrinsic offense evidence is relevant to an issue other than the defendant’s character. Second, the evidence must possess probative value that is not substantially outweighed by its undue prejudice[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.