United States v. Napper’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2013
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1543 · 18 U.S.C. § 1544
Relies on Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Oyler v. Boles · United States v. Berrios · United States v. Philip Berrigan, in No. 72-1938, and Elizabeth McAlister Appeal of Elizabeth McAlister In
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.