Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 553 F. Supp. 2d 1131 - Kashkool v. Chertoff

553 F. Supp. 2d 1131 - Kashkool v. Chertoff’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
April 2016
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 5 U.S.C. § 555 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 6 U.S.C. § 271

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the time agencies take to make decisions must be governed by a “rule of reason”!;] (2) where Congress has provided a timetable or other indication of the speed with which it expects the agency to proceed in the enabling statute, that statutory scheme may supply content for this rule of reason [;] (3) delays that might be reasonable in the sphere of economic regulation are less tolerable when human health and welfare are at stake[;] (4) the court should consider the effect of expediting delayed action on agency activities of a higher or competing priority!;] (5) the court should also take into account the nature and extent of the interests prejudiced by delay!;] and (6) the court need not find any impropriety lurking behind agency lassitude in order to hold that agency action is unreasonably delayed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.