Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

553 N.E.2d 844

In re Sekerez

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1990

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1990-05-10

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 1999

9 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-05-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

¶2Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and files its Findings of Fact and Recommendation that the Petitioner, Zarko Sekerez, be reinstated to the practice of law.

¶3And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the Commission’s recommendation should be approved and the Petitioner should be reinstated.

¶4IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Petitioner, Zarko Sekerez, is hereby reinstated as an attorney at the Bar of this Court, effective immediately.

¶5The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward a copy of this order to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, to the Petitioner, to the State Board of Law Examiners, and to all parties who were previously notified of Petitioner’s suspension.

PIVARNIK, J., not participating.
/553/ne2d/844 · .json · Public domain