Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 553 P2D 520 - Wadley v. State

Wadley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
October 2004
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2004

1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

801976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shepard v. United States · 55 Cal. 2d 881 - People v. Hamilton · Romero v. People · Sallee v. State · 34 Okla. Crim. 165 - Tapedo v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is fully recognized that where hostile emotions at a particular time are to be proved in a case, the existence of the same emotion in the same person at another time is proper evidence. II Wig- more on Evidence, § 396 (3rd ed. 1940). And the conduct, attitude, and feelings of the accused and the deceased toward each other may be shown in a murder case to establish motive, malice or intent. I Wharton’s Criminal Evidence § 175. Evidence of prior assaults by the defendant upon the deceased is admissible in such a case even though such evidence constitutes evidence of another crime. II Wig-more on Evidence, § 363 (3rd ed. 1940). .” (Citations omitted)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “... evidence of an out-of-court declarant which is offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the declaration.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “But while the fact of prior assaults or ill-treatment is clearly a proper matter for proof in a murder case, the manner of that proof must not violate the rules of evidence and the defendant's right to a fair trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.