Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 553 P3D 276 - State v. Showalter

State v. Showalter’s Empirical Analysis

2024

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Brady v. United States · Malloy v. Hogan · Kastigar v. United States · Hoffman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The resulting privilege against compulsory self-incrimination fulfills the 7 essential role in our adversarial justice system of ensuring the State achieves criminal convictions by its own efforts, not by the forced disclosures of the accused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “can invoke a blanket privilege not to testify at their own trial, a compelled witness may only assert the privilege on a question-by-question basis and must establish a legitimate risk of incrimination to justify silence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “could be used in a criminal prosecution or could lead to other evidence that might be so used.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.