553 So. 2d 1052 - State v. Dabney’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1994
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 454 So. 2d 93 - State v. Nuccio · 506 So. 2d 584 - State v. Tatum · State v. Sherry · State v. Payne · 527 So. 2d 398 - State v. Livas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was not an unambiguous reference to a particular crime committed or alleged to have been committed by the defendant. A police officer's statement that he ran the defendant's name through the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Spears“an indirect, unexplained reference to information which the average juror may not have realized pertained to another crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Spears“the computer came back with the arrest information”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Spears
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.