Shaktman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably State v. Schultz (1993), Perez v. State (1993)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3126 (§ 301 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Olmstead v. United States · United States v. Giordano · United States v. New York Telephone Co. · 477 So. 2d 544 - Winfield v. Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering · Kehoe v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether an individual has a legitimate expectation of privacy in any given case must be made by considering all the circumstances, especially objective manifestations of that expectation.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Every natural person has the right to be let alone and free from governmental intrusion into his private life except as otherwise provided herein.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“determine for themselves when, how and to what extent information about them is communicated to others.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.