¶1As the prosecutor’s closing argument was within the latitude allowed by State v. Sheperd, 479 So.2d 106 (Fla.1985), the defendant’s objections and motion for mistrial were properly denied.
¶2Affirmed.
553 So. 2d 238
553 So.2d 238
14 Fla.L.Weekly 2705
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 21, 1989
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-11-21
Relies on 479 So. 2d 106 - State v. Sheperd
Decided 1989-11-21
¶1As the prosecutor’s closing argument was within the latitude allowed by State v. Sheperd, 479 So.2d 106 (Fla.1985), the defendant’s objections and motion for mistrial were properly denied.
¶2Affirmed.