¶1Appellant, Carl Mullings, appeals from a trial court order denying his motion for post-conviction relief under rule 3.850, Flor*288ida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm the order of the trial court based upon a holding that the motion was untimely filed; and the issues raised therein were procedurally barred and/or without merit. Rose v. State, 472 So.2d 1155 (Fla.1985); Zeigler v. State, 452 So.2d 537 (Fla.1984); Brown v. State, 430 So.2d 446 (Fla.1983); Ford v. State, 407 So.2d 907 (Fla.1981); Ponder v. State, 530 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Paez v. State, 512 So.2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Williams v. State, 473 So.2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).
553 So. 2d 287
553 So.2d 287
14 Fla.L.Weekly 2759
Mullings v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 28, 1989
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-11-28
Relies on 430 So. 2d 446 - Brown v. State · 452 So. 2d 537 - Zeigler v. State · 407 So. 2d 907 - Ford v. State
Decided 1989-11-28