Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 553 SO2D 522 - In Re Quick

In Re Quick’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
3
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

75 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably 883 So. 2d 1155 - Miss. Com'n on Jud. Performance v. Gibson (2004), 565 So. 2d 1117 - Judicial Performance Com'n v. Walker (1990)

75 state decisions

3901989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge Nowell · 412 So. 2d 743 - In Re Anderson · 466 So. 2d 884 - In Re Inquiry Concerning Garner · In Re Bailey · 524 So. 2d 553 - In Re Collins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While the conduct of Respondent, in our opinion, amounted to willful misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, bringing the judicial office into disrepute, we recognize as quoted in In re Anderson, supra , that a judge may also, through negligence or ignorance not amounting to bad faith, behave in a manner prejudicial to the administration of justice so as to bring the judicial office into disrepute. The result is the same regardless of whether bad faith or negligence and ignorance are involved and warrants sanctions.”
    48 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice which brings the judicial office into disrepute”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] judge should participate in establishing, maintaining, and enforcing, and should [himself] observe, high standards of conduct so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.