Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 553 So. 2d 652 - Wheeler v. State

553 So. 2d 652 - Wheeler v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2015

8 state decisions

401989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe · United States v. Weninger · 476 So. 2d 1236 - Dixon v. State · 441 So. 2d 1045 - Robinson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[T]he right to assistance of counsel does not imply the absolute right to counsel of one's choice. A defendant's right to obtain counsel of his choice must be balanced against the need for the efficient and effective administration of criminal justice.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"`"A valid waiver of counsel need not be express. However, courts are hesitant to validate an implied waiver. Nevertheless, a court may infer a knowing and intelligent waiver if the defendant fails to retain counsel after repeated urging by the court or discharges counsel in midtrial after explicit warnings."' Wheeler v. State , 553 So.2d 652 , 653 (Ala.Cr.App. 1989), quoting Project: Criminal Procedure , 76 Geo.L.J. 921, 928-30 (1988) (emphasis omitted)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.