Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

553 So. 2d 777

Docket No. 88-2866.

Wallace v. State

Debra Ann WALLACE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 20, 1989.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-12-20

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2006

7 state decisions

Relies on Brown v. State · Agee v. State · 501 So. 2d 176 - Brooks v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-12-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Peter Birch of Birch and Murrell, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Deborah Guller, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Debra Ann Wallace was convicted and sentenced for trafficking in cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia. Upon consideration of the testimony and the record it appears that the state did not establish that Ms. Wallace was in constructive possession of the contraband as required by Brown v. State,428 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1983). It appears that, at most, Wallace was in mere proximity to the cocaine and the drug paraphernalia. Agee v. State,522 So.2d 1044, 1046 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) ("Mere proximity to the contraband without more, is legally insufficient to prove possession"). Thus the trial judge erred in denying her motion for judgment of acquittal presented at the end of the state's case. Richardson v. State,488 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

¶5We reverse upon authority of Brooks v. State,501 So.2d 176 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), and Green v. State,460 So.2d 986 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

¶6REVERSED.

¶7GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and WARNER, JJ., concur.

/553/so2d/777 · .json · Public domain