Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 553 SW2D 885 - State v. Coleman

State v. Coleman’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1983
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Granberry · State v. Brown · State v. Turnbough · Fedorinchik v. Stewart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The purpose of the examination by defendant of the panel on their voir dire is to develop, not only facts which might form the basis of a challenge for cause, but also such facts as might be useful to him in intelligently determining his peremptory challenges.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Great liberality is allowed in inquiring into attitudes and experiences of the jury panel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.