Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 553 SW3D 808 - Cox v. Commonwealth

Cox v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Richardson v. United States · Johnson v. Louisiana · Andres v. United States · Commonwealth v. English

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he standard of review of an evidentiary ruling is abuse of discretion. The test for abuse of discretion is whether the trial judge's decision was arbitrary, unreasonable, unfair, or unsupported by sound legal principles.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.