Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 554 A2D 778 - Carr v. State

Carr v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
12
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably State v. Reid (2006), Silverbrand v. County of Los Angeles (2009)

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 52 state decisions — followed in 12 states

4001989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Houston v. Lack · Fallen v. United States · Bey v. State · In Re LR · Riggs v. Riggs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “did not establish as a constitutional requirement that there must be a prison mailbox rule. Instead, the Supreme Court merely interpreted the procedure provided for in the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Thus, the case of Houston v. Lack does not compel this court to abandon its own precedent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “No appeal from the Superior Court in a criminal action shall be received or entertained in the Supreme Court unless the praecipe or notice of appeal is duly filed in the office of the Clerk thereof within 30 days after the date of the judgment or decree. 5”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a notice of appeal filing deadline is not subject to enlargement in Delaware.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.