Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 554 F.2d 1341 - United States v. Tate

United States v. Tate’s Empirical Analysis

554 F.2d 1341 · 1977

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 2010

18 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

11019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roviaro v. United States · United States v. Russell · Sorrells v. United States · Sherman v. United States · Hampton v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"To raise the defense of entrapment, the defendant has the burden of presenting evidence that a law enforcement officer, or agent of a law enforcement officer, by initiating the illegal conduct himself, induced the defendant to commit the offense.... "If you find that the defendant has presented such evidence, ... then the Government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the inducement was not the cause of the crime, but that the defendant was predisposed to commit the crime — that is, that he was ready and willing to commit the crime in spite of the acts of inducement by the Government agent.” United States v. Tate, 554 F.2d at 1343 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If there is any evidence in the record that, if believed by the jury, would show that the government’s conduct created a substantial risk that the offense would be committed by a person other than one ready to commit it, then, as in all other cases, involving questions of guilt or innocence, the jury must be permitted to resolve the matter. 3”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “To raise the defense of entrapment, the defendant has the burden of presenting evidence that a law enforcement officer, or agent of a law enforcement officer, by initiating the illegal conduct himself, induced the defendant to commit the offense....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.