Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 554 F.2d 372 - United States v. Green

United States v. Green’s Empirical Analysis

554 F.2d 372 · 1977

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
3
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Harris v. Pulley (1988), United States v. Eaglin (1977)

23 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

170197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2421 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act)) · 18 U.S.C. § 2422 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act))

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Romano v. United States · City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey · Perini v. Downey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... The statute may be violated by either males or females; it is thus sexually neutral and does not raise questions of an illegal classification. See United States v. Caesar, 368 F.Supp. 328, 333 (E.D.Wis.1973). Compare McLaughlin v. Florida, 379 U.S. 184 , 85 S.Ct. 283 , 13 L.Ed.2d 222 (1964). The fact that the class of possible victims is limited to females does not present defendant with a ground to attack the statute's constitutionality." [7]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We adopt Garrett as the law of this circuit. See also United States v. Caesar, 368 F.2d 328 (E.D.Wis.1973), affd. 519 F.2d 1405 (C.A.7 1975).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.