United States v. Kaplan’s Empirical Analysis
554 F.2d 577 · 1977
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 5 district · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably United States v. Tarantino (1988), State v. Smith (1983)
24 federal appellate · 5 district · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7206
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Weatherford v. Bursey · Wardius v. Oregon · Anderson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[O]n occasion there will be an overlap between the two means a federal defendant uses to obtain information in the possession of the prosecutor.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“F.R.Crim.P. 16(b) Disclosure of Evidence by the Defendant. (1) Information Subject to Disclosure. (A) Documents and Tangible Objects. If the defendant requests disclosure under subdivision (a)(1)(C) or (D) of this rule, upon compliance with such request by the government, the defendant, on request of the government, shall permit the government to inspect and copy or photograph books, papers, documents, photographs, tangible objects, or copies or portions thereof, which are within the possession, custody, or control of the de~ fendant and which the defendant intends to introduce as evidence in chief at the trial. (B) Reports of Examination and Tests. If the defendant requests disclosure under subdivision (a)(1)(C) or (D) of this rule, upon compliance with such request by the government, the defendant, on request of the government, shall permit the government to inspect and copy or photograph any results or reports of physical or mental examinations and of scientific tests or experiments made in connection with the particular case, or copies thereof, within the possession or control of the defendant, which the defendant intends to introduce as evidence in chief at the trial or which were prepared by a witness whom the defendant intends to call at the trial when the results or reports relate to his testimony. F.R.Crim.P. 16(c) Continuing Duty to Disclose. If, prior to or during trial, a party discovers additional evidence or material previously requested or ordered, which is sub”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e disapprove and discourage a practice of delayed production of Brady materials.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. No 06-3098
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.