Turley v. Wyrick’s Empirical Analysis
554 F.2d 840 · 1977
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably United States v. Pungitore (1990), United States v. Hayes (1979)
24 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · Benton v. Maryland · Elkins v. United States · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the issue sought to be precluded must be the same as that involved in the prior action; (2) the issue must have been litigated in the prior action; (3) the issue must have been determined by a valid and final judgment; and (4) the determination must have been essential to the prior judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“collateral estoppel doctrine does not apply when different sovereigns and, thus, different parties are involved in the litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.