Wilson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
554 F.2d 893 · 1977
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably Barrett v. United States (1992), United States v. Newman (1988)
25 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Ross v. Moffitt · Costarelli v. Massachusetts · Skibs A/S Jolund v. American Smelting & Refining Co. · Schreiner v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Failure to advise a defendant of his right to petition for certiorari in the Supreme Court violates his right to effective assistance of counsel as guaranteed by Fed. R.Crim.P. 44(a) and the Criminal Justice Act of 1964,18 U.S.C. § 3006A (1970), see Report of the Committee to Implement the Criminal Justice Act of 1964, 36 F.R.D. 282 , 291 (1965); Lacaze v. United States, 457 F.2d 1075 , 1078 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 921 , 93 S.Ct. 251 , 34 L.Ed.2d 180 (1972), and violated Section V of the Eighth Circuit Plan to Implement the Criminal Justice Act of 1964. Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit App. at A-15 (1976). It may also violate constitutional rights to effective assistance of counsel and due process of law. Cf. Williams v. United States, 402 F.2d 548 (8th Cir. 1968); Dillane v. United States, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 354 , 350 F.2d 732 (1965) (failure to advise of the right to a direct appeal).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.