Young v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
554 F.3d 1254 · 2009
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Fox v. Hayes (2010), Requena v. Roberts (2018)
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Gerstein v. Pugh · Baker v. McCollan · Wallace v. Kato · Wallace v. Kato
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[Sjtate law governs the application of tolling in a [federal] civil rights action.” Alexander v. Oklahoma, 382 F.3d 1206, 1217 (10th Cir.2004). “In general, Oklahoma permits the tolling of a statute of limitations in two circumstances.” Id. The first circumstance is the existence of a legal disability, which has been applied in eases where a plaintiffs competency is impaired or where the plaintiff has not yet reached the age of majority. Id. The second circumstance is when “defendants engage in false, fraudulent or misleading conduct calculated to lull plaintiffs into sitting on their rights.” Id. (quotation omitted). This court noted also that “[i]n the appropriate case, exceptional circumstances may justify tolling a statute of limitations.” Id. at 1219 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“accept all ... well-pleaded allegations ... as true and ... construe them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Requena v. Roberts“[T]he complaint [must] include[ ] enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Requena v. Roberts
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.