Hubbard v. Sobreck, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
554 F.3d 742 · 2008
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12205 (§ 505 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Guerra · Bolker v. Commissioner · Summers v. A. Teichert & Son, Inc. · Klingebiel v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp. · 119 Cal. App. 4th 498 - Carver v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a grant of fees on the California cause of action is necessarily a grant of fees as to the ADA claim.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[f]ees are not discretionary; they are mandatory.... Given this language, we have no basis for doubting that the California Supreme Court will agree with Molski as to the meaning of Section 55. [Citation.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is inconsistent with, and therefore preempted by, the ADA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.