Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

554 F. App'x 347

Mark McManaway v. KBR, Incorporated

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 30, 2014

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2014-04-30

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 2018

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-04-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶2ORDER:

¶3Treating the petition for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed R.App. P. and 5th Cir. R. 35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

¶4In the en banc poll, five judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Jolly, Jones, Smith, Clement, and Owen), and nine judges voted against rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Davis, Dennis, Prado, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, and Higginson).

/554/fappx/347 · .json · Public domain