Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 554 FSUPP 308 - Garland v. Herrin

Garland v. Herrin’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1989
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Fischer v. Maloney · Tobin v. Grossman · Battalla v. State · Archibald v. Braverman · Halio v. Lurie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The limitation may be justified by the practical necessity of drawing the line somewhere, since the number of persons who may suffer emotional distress at the news of an assassination of the President is virtually unlimited, and the distress of a woman who is informed of her husband's murder ten years afterward may lack the guarantee of genuineness which her presence on the spot would afford.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.