Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 554 NE2D 1177 - Hollars v. Randall

Hollars v. Randall’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. · 95 Ill. App. 3d 501 - Arnold v. Leahy Home Building Co. · Donavan v. Ivy Knoll Apartments Partnership · Lewandowski v. Beverly · North v. Newlin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the provision were truly for liquidated damages, the Hollars would have had an adequate remedy at law and would not have been entitled to specific performance.” Id. at 1179 n. 1. We do not think that the court meant by this footnote to announce a rule contrary to Duckwall, supra. The court assumes that the parties would have intended that a”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.