Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 554 NW2D 70 - State v. Orsello

State v. Orsello’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably State v. Fleck (2012), State v. Behl (1997)

29 state decisions

140199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Connally v. General Construction Co. · Lanzetta v. State New Jersey · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Jacobellis v. Ohio · Liparota v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Wdien criminal intent is an element of a crime in this chapter, such intent is indicated by the term “intentionally,” the phrase “with intent to,” the phrase “with intent that,” or some form of the verbs “know” or “believe.” (2) “Know” requires only that the actor believes that the specified fact exists.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““harass” means to engage in intentional conduct in a manner that: (1) would cause a reasonable person under the circumstances to feel oppressed, persecuted, or intimidated; and (2) causes this reaction on the part of the victim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the actor either has a purpose to do the thing or cause the result specified or believes that the act, if successful, will cause that result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.