554 So. 2d 1000 - Wright v. Land Developers Construction Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on La Vale Plaza, Inc. v. R. S. Noonan, Inc. · Michaels Mariforum Shipping Sa M/v Leslie 1974 · Galloway Coal Co. v. Stanford · Mercury Oil Refining Co. v. Oil Workers International Union · 548 So. 2d 157 - Ex Parte Warren
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(d) Where the arbitrators exceeded their powers, or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final, and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“that it violated the FAA and should not be allowed to stand. Fuller also contends that the arbitrators abused their discretion in allowing IDB to file its fraud claim at such a late stage in the proceedings. At the outset, we note that neither side contends that the FAA does not apply in this case. In fact, Fuller's argument on appeal is based on the applicability of the FAA. Therefore, there is no issue presented as to whether this case involved a contract in”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.