Allison v. Allison’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 509 So. 2d 1141 - DePoorter v. DePoorter · 434 So. 2d 61 - McIntyre v. McIntyre · 533 So. 2d 828 - Kuse v. Kuse · 442 So. 2d 1054 - Penland v. Penland · In re Amendment to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure — Rule 3.851
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A possibility that income will decrease is not knowledge that it will do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mendes v. Mendes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.