Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 554 SO2D 180 - State v. Lee

State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2016

14 state decisions

801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Unimet Corp. v. United Steelworkers · State v. Doughty · 292 So. 2d 505 - State Ex Rel. Wikberg v. Henderson · 468 So. 2d 554 - State Ex Rel. Sawyer v. Maggio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When proof of the commission of a felony (armed robbery in this instance) is an essential element of a first-degree murder or an attempted first degree murder, the defendant cannot be convicted and punished for both the murder or attempted murder and the underlying felony. State ex rel. Wikberg v. Henderson, supra [ 292 So.2d 505 (La. 1974) ]; State v. Rogers, 462 So.2d 684 (La.App. 4th Cir.1984), writ denied, 478 So.2d 899 ; State v. Bradford, 514 So.2d 534 (La.App. 3d Cir.1987), writ denied, 523 So.2d 226 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 835 , 109 S.Ct. 97 , 102 L.Ed.2d 73 (1988). . . . . Where multiple sentences subject a defendant to double jeopardy, the conviction and sentence for the less severely punishable offense are to be vacated. State v. Doughty, supra [ 379 So.2d 1088 (La.1980) ].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.