Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 554 So. 2d 232 - State v. Taylor

554 So. 2d 232 - State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2001
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Spiers v. Seal · 426 So. 2d 351 - Fontana v. Fontana · 514 So. 2d 636 - Hawn Tool Co. v. Crystal Oil Co. · Goins v. Goins · State v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] contempt proceeding ancillary to a civil proceeding assumes the quality of a criminal or quasi-criminal proceeding only after a criminal sentence has been imposed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.