Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

554 So. 2d 25

Spears v. Enfinger

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 22, 1989

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-12-22

Decided 1989-12-22

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellants, Wastle and Lillian Spears, have failed to show the way of necessity approved by the trial court was unreasonable, impracticable or substantially inadequate. Even though we, sitting as fact-finders, may have arrived at a different result, we cannot say that the trial court’s exercise of authority was a reversible abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we herewith affirm the trial court’s finding.

SMITH, THOMPSON and MINER, JJ., concur.
/554/so2d/25 · .json · Public domain