¶1Appellants, Wastle and Lillian Spears, have failed to show the way of necessity approved by the trial court was unreasonable, impracticable or substantially inadequate. Even though we, sitting as fact-finders, may have arrived at a different result, we cannot say that the trial court’s exercise of authority was a reversible abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we herewith affirm the trial court’s finding.
554 So. 2d 25
Spears v. Enfinger
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 22, 1989
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-12-22
Decided 1989-12-22