Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 554 So. 2d 557 - Ruddy v. Ashton

554 So. 2d 557 - Ruddy v. Ashton’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1992
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 475 So. 2d 227 - Wieczoreck v. H & H BUILDERS, INC. · Wieczoreck v. H & H BUILDERS, INC. · 363 So. 2d 613 - Robert B. Ehmann, Inc. v. Bergh · Conway Meats, Inc. v. Orange Ave. Ptshp. · 492 So. 2d 1100 - State v. Rosario

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a matter of law, prior to impleading any party, the trial court should conduct an examination of the judgment creditor or appoint a Master to do this for it. Section 56.29(2), Florida Statutes. If the examination of the judgment creditor establishes the judgment creditor's claim to property in the hands of third parties, the trial court should then issue an Order to Show Cause setting forth the findings of specific assets or transactions to which the third parties can respond in writing prior to further proceedings. Ehmann, supra. at 614.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.