Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

554 So. 2d 669

Nichols v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 5, 1990

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-01-05

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 2016

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-01-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the defendant’s judgments and sentences for two separate acts, sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine. The trial court correctly enhanced the sentence under the habitual offender statute and made the necessary findings on the record. § 775.084, Fla.Stat. (1987). On remand, however, each sentence shall be clerically corrected to reflect that the defendant was sentenced under the special provisions for habitual offenders.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
/554/so2d/669 · .json · Public domain