Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

554 So. 2d 670

Zimmerman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 5, 1990

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-01-05

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1992

2 state decisions

Relies on 529 So. 2d 1106 - Smith v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-01-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the defendant’s sentence which was an upward departure from the presumptive guidelines sentence. The defendant’s negotiated plea agreement was a valid reason upon which to base a departure sentence. Smith v. State, 529 So.2d 1106 (Fla.1988).

¶2Appellant also argues that the trial court erred in failing to rule upon his pro se motion for jail time credit. This motion may not have come to the court’s attention until after appellant had filed his notice of appeal. Accordingly, this opinion is without prejudice to appellant to renew the motion after our mandate has issued.

¶3Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
/554/so2d/670 · .json · Public domain