Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 554 So. 2d 887 - Shell v. State

554 So. 2d 887 - Shell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

113
cited by 113 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

99 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 113 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2017 · most notably Shell v. Mississippi (1990), 592 So. 2d 114 - Hansen v. State (1991)

99 state decisions

6101989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Doyle v. Ohio · Eddings v. Oklahoma · Maynard v. Cartwright · Trammel v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 113 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in the mitigating circumstances portion of the jury instructions”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[The prosecutor] may comment upon any facts introduced into evidence. He may draw whatever deductions seem to him proper from these facts, so long as he does not use violent and abusive language, and even in many cases invectives may be justified and even called for, as pointed out by Chief Justice Whitfield in Gray v. State, 90 Miss. 235 , 43 So. 289 [1907].”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[T]he word heinous means extremely wicked or shockingly evil; atrocious means outrageously wicked and vile; and cruel means designed to inflict a high degree of pain with indifference to, or even enjoyment of the suffering of others.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.