James v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2006
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ford v. State · McDonald v. State · Ransom v. State · Cameron v. State · Cobb v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there was no proximity in time or place of the extraneous offense to the offense for which the appellant was on trial.” No other offenses “sufficient to show a continuing course of conduct”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Linder v. State“coupled with no evidence of other intervening similar offenses, and no final conviction for the extraneous offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Linder v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.