Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 554 SW3D 541 - Ban v. State

Ban v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sanders v. State · Roberts v. State · State ex rel. Strauser v. Martinez · Taylor v. State · State ex rel. Ryan W. Amorine, Relator v. The Honorable Kelly Wayne Parker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he award or rescission of any credits earned under this section shall not be subject to appeal or any motion for postconviction relief.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “claim does not present a challenge to the division [of probation and parole]'s calculation of an award or rescission of earned compliance credits, but instead posits that the circuit court did not apply the earned compliance credits appropriately awarded him by the division.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A person is considered to be 'in compliance' when there is the absence of an initial violation report submitted by a probation or parole officer during the calendar month, or the absence of a motion to revoke or motion to suspend filed by the prosecuting or circuit attorney.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.