Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 554 U.S. 191 - Rothgery v. Gillespie County

Rothgery v. Gillespie County’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

441
cited by 441 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
31
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

59 federal appellate · 17 district · 231 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 441 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2025 · most notably Montejo v. Louisiana (2009), Commonwealth v. Briggs (2011)

59 federal appellate · 17 district · 231 state decisions — followed in 31 states

3290200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedRothgery v. Gillespie County (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Gideon v. Wainwright · United States v. Wade · Edwards v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 441 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “by way of formal charge, preliminary hearing, indictment, information, or arraignment.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the government has committed itself to prosecute, the adverse positions of government and defendant have solidified, and the accused finds himself faced with the prosecutorial forces of organized society and immersed in the intricacies of substantive and procedural criminal law.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A] criminal defendant's initial appearance before a judicial officer, where he learns the charge against him and his liberty is subject to restriction, marks the start of adversary judicial proceedings that trigger attachment of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.