Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 554 U.S. 33 - Florida Department of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc.

Florida Department of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

554 U.S. 33 · 2008

Citation profile

403
cited by 403 later decisions
21
cited 21 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

145 federal appellate · 14 district · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 403 later decisions (21 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2025 · most notably Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc. (2009), Nken v. Holder (2009)

145 federal appellate · 14 district · 25 state decisions

3240200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1101 · 11 U.S.C. § 1123 · 11 U.S.C. § 1127 · 11 U.S.C. § 1146

Relies on Russello v. United States · Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. · Lorillard v. Pons · Correction Officer Porters v. Ronald Nussle · National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 403 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “are but tools available for the resolution of a doubt,”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]n ... [a sale] scenario, the debtor typically submits for confirmation a plan of liquidation ... providing for the distribution of the proceeds resulting from the sale,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A] subchapter heading cannot substitute for the operative text of the statute.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.